Commanding the Army of the Potomac Stephen R. Collectively charged with leading the Union's most significant field army, these leaders proved their courage in countless battlefields from Gettysburg to Antietam to Cold Harbor.
Let's start with that. When you're a respected scholar of the Civil War, and you write a trilogy on that subject, there are going to be comparisons to Foote's enormous and consistently awesome The Civil War: It's not fair, of course, but neither is my car breaking down twice in one week.
Rig This isn't anything like Shelby Foote's trilogy. Right off, you see that this isn't going to be anything like Foote. That's not necessarily a bad thing.
Foote's work stands alone, the absolute, Homeric epic of the American Civil War. Catton's trilogy, helpfully combined in one battered hardcover that smells like the 60s, is a different animal. Referred to as the "Army of the Potomac trilogy," Catton's focus is far narrower than Foote. His is an Eastern-Theater-centric retelling of the Civil War, focused on the men and leaders of that much maligned Union Army.
Just as a digression, casual "fans" of the Civil War probably won't miss much with Catton's focus on the East, since the Western Theater consistently gets short-shrift. This eventually-triumphant Army was led by the sad likes of the out-of-his-depth McClellan, the blustering Hooker probably distracted by all the camp followers Since I found all three books in one volume, among my dad's Vietnam-era college textbooks, I decided I'd review them all together.
I'm not getting paid by the review, after all. The first book is Mr. Since the Army of the Potomac was only an observer to this trouncing, the action picks up with General George B.
McClellan being returned to overall command, after the unfortunate John Pope experiment. Overall, Catton's trilogy is lucid, witty, well-paced, and mostly-accessible to general readers. However, this opening is a bit confusing, and you might, as I did, struggle to get your bearings.
Catton skips right over the start of the war, including First Bull Run. While I appreciate avoiding another a half-hearted prologue in which an author attempts to explain the origins of the Civil War it was slaverya little context can go a long way. You're probably 20 pages in before you figure out where the book has started.
The first book really gains steam as it nears Antietam, which Catton elevates from a pyrrhic Union victory to a central event in the Civil War and by extension, human history. In Catton's telling, if the Union had won smashingly at Antietam, the war might have ended with reunification, though with slavery still intact.
The fact that McClellan only half-won forced Lincoln to make the war into something bigger: So followed the Emancipation Proclamation. Glory Road and A Stillness at Appomattox are stronger than their predecessor.
Both of them avoid the sputtering start of Mr. Lincoln's Army and hew to a more conventional chronological approach. Glory Road takes the Army of the Potomac from one disaster to another - Fredericksburg, Chancellorsville - before its apotheosis at Gettysburg.
The overall theme of the three books is that the Army of the Potomac always had good men, and that in general, its victories were won despite its leadership, rather than because of them. In supporting this view, Catton does a fascinating job illuminating the life of a Civil War soldier.
Beyond the typical diaries, journals, and writings of the actual soldiers, Catton inserts digressions about food, clothing, and shelter that answer all the questions you had about soldiering but were afraid to ask.Commanders of the Army of the Potomac In his civil war book Commanders of the Army of the Potomac Warren Hassler Jr.
fantastically recounts the events that transpired between to during which seven men were given the reigns of the North's Army of the Potomac and asked to .
In which we see the Army of the Potomac disembark at Fort Monroe and begin its march up the Peninsula in April, Our book recommendation for this episode is “The Peninsula Campaign of A Military Analysis” by Kevin Dougherty with J. Michael Moore. The battle of Chancellorsville is a victory that never materialized for the Army of the Potomac.
The Union’s Army of the Potomac, on paper, was a force clearly superior in terms of manpower and technology to that of their adversary, however, tactical mistakes proved to be detrimental to their cause.
Lincoln's Cavalrymen: A History of the Mounted Forces of the Army of the Potomac [Edward G. Longacre] on plombier-nemours.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. First modern study to focus solely on the cavalry of the Army of the Potomac.
Includes all major battles and commanders/5(7). mmii military men-at-arms series army of the potomac 38 philip k-\tcher \licr\el yole:'\s r;mm hiutary editopc martin windrow men-at-arms series army of the potomac text by philip katcher colour plates by michael youens 38 published in b) osprc).
The Army of the Potomac was the principal Union Army in the Eastern Theater of the American Civil plombier-nemours.com was created in July shortly after the First Battle of Bull Run and was disbanded in May following the surrender of the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia in April.