Plot overview and analysis written by an experienced literary critic. Full study guide for this title currently under development. To be notified when we launch a full study guide, please contact us. The essays laid out his ideas about how the ultra-rich should use their assets to ameliorate the unequal distribution of wealth, rather than hoarding their money.
The conditions of human life have not only been changed, but revolutionized, within the past few hundred years. In former days there was little difference between the dwelling, dress, food, and environment of the chief and those of his retainers.
The Indians are today where civilized man then was. When visiting the Sioux, I was led to the wigwam of the chief. It was just like the others in external appearance, and even within the difference was trifling between it and those of the poorest of his braves.
The contrast between the palace of the millionaire and the cottage of the laborer with us today measures the change which has come with civilization. This change, however, is not to be deplored, but welcomed as highly beneficial.
It is well, nay, essential for the progress of the race, that the houses of some should be homes for all that is highest and best in literature and the arts, and for all the refinements of civilization, rather than that none should be so. Much better this great irregularity than universal squalor.
The "good old times " were not good old times. Neither master nor servant was as well situated then as to-day.
A relapse to old conditions would be disastrous to both—not the least so to him who serves—and would sweep away civilization with it. But whether the change be for good or ill, it is upon us, beyond our power to alter, and therefore to be accepted and made the best of.
It is a waste of time to criticize the inevitable. It is easy to see how the change has come. One illustration will serve for almost every phase of the cause. In the manufacture of products we have the whole story.
It applies to all combinations of human industry, as stimulated and enlarged by the inventions of this scientific age. Formerly articles were manufactured at the domestic hearth or in small shops which formed part of the household. The master and his apprentices worked side by side, the latter living with the master, and therefore subject to the same conditions.
When these apprentices rose to be masters, there was little or no change in their mode of life, and they, in turn, educated in the same routine succeeding apprentices.
There was, substantially social equality, and even political equality, for those engaged in industrial pursuits had then little or no political voice in the State.
What were the luxuries have become the necessaries of life. The laborer has now more comforts than the landlord had a few generations ago.
Today the world obtains commodities of excellent quality at prices which even the generation preceding this would have deemed incredible. In the commercial world similar causes have produced similar results, and the race is benefited thereby.
The poor enjoy what the rich could not before afford. The farmer has more luxuries than the landlord had, and is more richly clad and better housed. The landlord has books and pictures rarer, and appointments more artistic, than the King could then obtain.
The price we pay for this salutary change is, no doubt, great. We assemble thousands of operatives in the factory, in the mine, and in the counting-house, of whom the employer can know little or nothing, and to whom the employer is little better than a myth. All intercourse between them is at an end.
Rigid castes are formed, and, as usual, mutual ignorance breeds mutual distrust. Each caste is without sympathy for the other, and ready to credit anything disparaging in regard to it. Under the law of competition, the employer of thousands is forced into the strictest economies, among which the rates paid to labor figure prominently, and often there is friction between the employer and the employed, between capital and labor, between rich and poor.
Human society loses homogeneity. The price which society pays for the law of competition, like the price it pays for cheap comforts and luxuries, is also great; but the advantage of this law are also greater still, for it is to this law that we owe our wonderful material development, which brings improved conditions in its train.
But, whether the law be benign or not, we must say of it, as we say of the change in the conditions of men to which we have referred:In , the steel magnate Andrew Carnegie published a pair of articles later known as “The Gospel of Wealth” in the North American Review.
The essays laid out his ideas about how the ultra-rich should use their assets to ameliorate the unequal distribution of wealth, rather than hoarding their money. By this time, Carnegie was [ ]. The gospel preached of how anyone could become wealthy and powerful without help from anyone but from himself.
Hard work, honesty, and good will where the only requirements to rise from rags to riches. The “Gospel of Wealth” was written by Andrew Carnegie during the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. He was born in Scotland and immigrated to the United States in He was born in Scotland and immigrated to the United States in Carnegie gospel of wealth essay.
November 25, Carnegie gospel of wealth essay. 5 stars based on reviews plombier-nemours.com Essay. virginia woolf essay luthien descriptive essay les jaloux vont maigrir explication essay gender discrimination persuasive essay.
Essay on Andrew Carnegie and “The Gospel of Wealth” In: Popular topics May 10th, Andrew Carnegie is widely known as a prominent millionaire and a steel magnate who gained fame for his characteristic attitude towards wealth and responsibility that is associated with it.
Free Essay: Andrew Carnegie's Gospel of Wealth Andrew Carnegie believes in a system based on principles and responsibility. The system is Individualism and.